The Medieval Globe, Black Death as a Global Pandemic
The Medieval Globe explores the modes of communication, materials of exchange, and myriad interconnections among regions, communities, and individuals in an era central to human history. It promotes scholarship in three related areas of study:
• 1. the direct and indirect means by which peoples, goods, and ideas came into contact
• 2. the deep roots of allegedly modern global developments
• 3. the ways in which perceptions of “the medieval” have been (and are) constructed and deployed around the world.
Contributions to a global understanding of the medieval period need not encompass the globe in any territorial sense. The Medieval Globe advances a new theory and praxis of medieval studies by bringing into view phenomena that have been rendered practically or conceptually invisible by anachronistic boundaries, categories, and expectations: these include networks, communities, bodies of knowledge, forms of movement, varieties of interaction, and identities. It invites submissions that analyze actual or potential connections, trace trajectories and currents, address topics of broad interest, or pioneer portable methodologies.
The Medieval Globe (TMG) is a peer-reviewed journal to be launched in 2014-15 with a special issue on the Black Death as a global pandemic, edited by Monica Green (Arizona State University). It will be published in both print and digital formats. Themed issues will alternate with issues composed of articles submitted for consideration on a rolling basis. Future issues might address such topics as: pilgrimage, diasporas, race and racializing technologies, maritime cultures and ports-of-call, piracy and crime, knowledge networks, markets and consumerism, entertainment, spoils and spolia, global localities, comparative cosmographies, sites of translation and acculturation, slavery and social mobility.
“Epic (and) News in the Renaissance”
Due: March 15, 2014
Please send 200-300 word abstract and CV to Prof. Phillip John Usher (email@example.com) by March 10, 2014.
SAIMS/TMJ ESSAY PRIZE
Due: March 31, 2014
SAIMS invites entries for its annual Essay Competition, submitted according to the following rules:
1. The competition is open to all medievalists who are graduate students or have completed a higher degree within the last three years. For PhD students the time period of three years begins from the date of the successful viva, but excludes any career break. Any candidate in doubt of their eligibility should contact the Director of SAIMS at firstname.lastname@example.org.
2. A candidate may make only one submission to the competition.
3. The submission must be the candidate’s own work, based on original research, and must not have been previously published or accepted for publication.
4. Submissions are welcomed on any topic that falls within the scope of medieval studies.
5. The submission should be in the English language.
6. The word limit is 8,000 words, including notes, bibliography, and any appendices.
7. The text should be double-spaced, and be accompanied by footnotes with short referencing and a full bibliography of works cited, following the guidelines on the TMJ webpage: http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/saims/tmj.htm. An abstract of 200 words should preface the main text.
8. The deadline for submissions is 31 March 2014.
9. The essay must be submitted electronically to email@example.com, in both Word and pdf formats, to arrive by the deadline.
10. The submission must be accompanied by a completed cover sheet and signed declaration; the template for this is available at http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/saims/tmj.htm. The candidate’s name should not appear on the submission itself, nor be indicated in any form in the notes.
11. Decisions concerning the Competition lie with the Editors and Editorial Board of The Mediaeval Journal, who can, if they consider there to have been appropriate submissions, award an Essay Prize and in addition declare a proxime accessit. In the unlikely event that, in the judges’ opinion, the material submitted is not of a suitable standard, no prize will be awarded.
12. The value of the Prize is £500.
13. A candidate whose entry is declared proxime accessit will be awarded £100.
14. In addition to the Prize, the winning submission will be published within twelve months in The Mediaeval Journal, subject to the usual editorial procedures of the journal.
Any queries concerning these rules may be directed to the Director of SAIMS who can be contacted at:
The Retro-Futurism of Cuteness
Due: April 1, 2014
Error and Print Culture, 1500-1800: A one-day conference at the Centre for the Study of the Book, Oxford University
Due: April 14, 2014
Saturday 5 July 2014
Call for Papers
‘Pag. 8. lin. 7. for laughing, reade, languishing.’
Richard Bellings, A Sixth Booke to the Countesse of Pembrokes Arcadia (1624), `Errata´
Recent histories of the book have replaced earlier narratives of technological triumph and revolutionary change with a more tentative story of continuities with manuscript culture and the instability of print. An abstract sense of technological agency has given way to a messier world of collaboration, muddle, money, and imperfection. Less a confident stride towards modernity, the early modern book now looks stranger: not quite yet a thing of our world.
What role might error have in these new histories of the hand-press book? What kinds of error are characteristic of print, and what can error tell us about print culture? Are particular forms of publication prone to particular mistakes? How effective were mechanisms of correction (cancel-slips; errata lists; over-printing; and so on), and what roles did the printing house corrector perform? Did readers care about mistakes? Did authors have a sense of print as an error-prone, fallen medium, and if so, how did this inform their writing? What links might we draw between representations of error in literary works (like Spenser’s Faerie Queene), and the presence of error in print? How might we think about error and retouching or correcting rolling-press plates? What is the relationship between engraving historians’ continuum of difference, and letter-press bibliographers’ binary of variant/invariant? Was there a relationship between bibliographical error and sin, particularly in the context of the Reformation? How might modern editors of early modern texts respond to errors: are errors things to correct, or to dutifully transcribe? Is the history of the book a story of the gradual elimination of error, or might we propose a more productive role for slips and blunders?
Proposals for 20-minute papers are welcome on any aspect of error and print, in Anglophone or non-Anglophone cultures. Please email a 300-word abstract and a short CV to Dr Adam Smyth (firstname.lastname@example.org) by 14 April 2014.
Special Issue of Shakespeare on “Shakespeare and Jonson”
Due: May 1, 2014
The critical pairing of Jonson and Shakespeare might be one of the least illuminating comparisons in literary history, but it is also one of the most enduring. The distinctiveness of the Jonson-Shakespeare pairing lies in the often implicit assumption that these two somehow function as each other’s alternative; that between them they define a crucial axis of literary possibility – between learning and imagination, or inspiration and labour. The comparison has often served to elevate Shakespeare over Jonson, on grounds sometimes less aesthetic than crudely moral – Jonsonian envy or ethical failure used to highlight Shakespeare’s generosity or singular virtue. This, in turn, has generated responses which are sometimes guilty of partisanship or defensiveness.
These tendencies are still visible today in academic and popular evocations of “Shakespeare and Jonson”. Yet in other ways the pairing itself might seem archaic. The vastness of the Shakespeare industry has ensured that the Bard (when not assumed to be beyond compare) has benefited from a much less restrictive set of comparisons. For Jonson, the picture is more mixed. He has benefited from attention in areas with a less obviously Shakespearean relevance, such as the court masque, and unlike the Oxford Middleton the new Cambridge edition of Jonson is not modelled on a Shakespearean template. To that extent, he is no longer automatically fated to a disadvantageously comparative approach. In other ways, though, he is receding from view. The RSC has not staged a Jonson play for more than a decade, while the Globe has never mounted a full production of one of his works.
What value, then, is to be found in reviving the old double act? How, now, can they speak to each other? What can their conjunction reveal that might otherwise remain obscure? This, in a year that sees the quatercentenary of the publication of Jonson’s first folio and of Shakespeare’s death, is what we seek to find out with this special issue of Shakespeare on “Shakespeare and Jonson”. We would be happy to consider essays from any approach, although we would wish them to avoid merely retreading the old pas de deux. Essays might shed light on the early years of their comparison, or episodes in its history that illuminate it anew. We would be interested, too, in essays seeking to bring Shakespearean and Jonsonian thematic or methodological concerns together. What might happen if Shakespearean concerns are transferred to the Jonsonian corpus, and vice versa? Examples of possible approaches might include, though are not limited to:
- Staging and performance history, especially recent critical developments. Is there any value in considering “Jonson in parts”, for example?
- Page and stage: in recent years, Shakespeare studies has debated the relative merits of approaching the plays as the work of a man of theatre and/or a ‘literary’ dramatist – how might Jonson appear in the light of such debates?
- Religion, Catholicism and Judaism (why, for example, is Shakespeare’s entirely speculative “Catholicism” wrangled over while Jonson’s conversions receive comparably little interest?)
- Nationality and ‘Britishness’;
- The politics of monarchy, republicanism, or the monarchical republic;
- Genders and sexualities
- Historicism and presentism: do Shakespearean debates here illuminate the Jonsonian corpus or concerns?
- Literary heritage, including neoclassical, Greek and/or medieval influences. The influence of post-medieval, vernacular drama upon Shakespeare is well-documented, while Jonson is often considered a consciously neoclassical dramatist. Is it time to revisit this distinction?
- Literary celebrity. Shakespeare’s reputation as national bard is firmly cemented, but the recently-discovered account of Ben Jonson’s walk to Scotland suggests a kind of “royal progress” between London and Edinburgh. Might this breathe new life into old debates? What might we learn about early modern ideas of literary fame, its social and political significance, or the history of the author as celebrity?
Other ways of staging the conjunction are no doubt possible, and we would be delighted to consider them. Please send expressions of interest or abstracts for papers of ???? words to email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org by 1st May 2014.
Medieval Materiality: A Conference on the Life and Afterlife of Things
Due: May, 1, 2014
Matters of the Word
Due: May 15, 2014
Barnard College’s twenty-fourth Medieval and Renaissance Conference
Saturday December 6, 2014
The conference organizers seek proposals for papers on issues of textual materiality in the medieval and Renaissance periods. This topic includes both the material upon which words are transmitted (parchment, paper, wood, marble, bodies, etc.), as well as the inscribed object’s visual aspects (illustrations, etc.). Interdisciplinary at its core, this conference examines not only the intersection of literary studies and art history, but also addresses central concerns of the history of science, history of law, aesthetic philosophy, museum conservation, and book history.
Confirmed keynote speakers:
-Brigitte Miriam Bedos-Rezak (Professor of History, NYU)
-Peter N. Miller (Professor of Cultural History and Dean, Bard Graduate Center)
We encourage submissions on all topics related to the conference theme. Possible panels might include, but are not limited to the following:
- Anachronic Texts. This panel would consider material texts that juxtapose or even superimpose different time periods (for example, the palimpsest)
- The Incunabulum. The materiality of the word in texts printed pre-1501
- Tablets and Inscriptions: How tablets, architectural façades and other non-book surfaces become sites of inscription
- Public Words: The materiality of words in public spaces, such as on monuments, stages, etc.
- Word, Image, and the Arts of Memory. The use of images in texts addressing the arts of memory
- Defaced Pages: The evidential and interpretive interest of texts marked by censorship and various forms of use.
- Objects of the Law: Legal authority and its material forms, such as seals, etc.
- Questioning the Materialist Turn. A forum for debating theoretical and philosophical problems of a materialist approach to artworks.
- Mapping the Word and the World. The presence of words, cartouches, and other textual objects in medieval and Early Modern cartography.
- The Digital Archive. Advantages and problems of the digitized archive, which makes material texts more widely available—but only through, arguably, effacing the materiality of the material text.
This conference is organized by Professors Rachel Eisendrath, Christopher Baswell, and Phillip John Usher, together with other members of the Medieval and Renaissance Studies Program at Barnard College, Columbia University.
Please send 300-word abstract by May 15, 2014, to the conference organizers: email@example.com
Eleventh International Milton Symposium
Due: June 10, 2014
The Eleventh International Milton Symposium will be held at the University of Exeter, England, 20-24 July, 2015. The Symposium, normally held every three years, brings together scholars from across the world for five days of lively discussion and convivial exchanges about all things Miltonic.
Plenary speakers include: Maggie Kilgour (McGill), Mary Nyquist (Toronto), David Quint (Yale), and Paul Stevens (Toronto).
Located in the beautiful Devon countryside, close to the sea and to Dartmoor National Park, the cathedral city of Exeter (founded by the Romans) is among those English cities most dramatically affected by the Civil War. Supporters of Parliament secured the city in 1642, and from early in 1643 it served as the western headquarters of the Parliamentary Army. After a determined and prolonged siege, it fell to Royalist forces in the autumn, who so strongly fortified the city that it was re-taken by the Parliamentary Army only in 1646. The rich Civil War History of Exeter will be a feature of the Symposium.
The Programme Committee warmly invites proposals for 20-minute papers on all aspects of Milton studies. Suggested topics include, but are not limited to, the following:
- The Civil War Milton and his (near) contemporaries Paces – geographical, symbolic, textual
- Families, children, generation(s)
- Harmony, music, dancing, soundscapes
- The emotions, the passions, the senses
- Drama, dialogue, soliloquy
- Controversy, polemic, satire
- Biblical, classical, humanist scholarship
- Death, mortalism, memory
Proposals for papers (500 words maximum, preferably in the form of an email attachment) should be submitted by 10 June 2014 to Karen Edwards (firstname.lastname@example.org) and Philip Schwyzer (email@example.com), English Department, Queen’s Building, Exeter University, Exeter EX4 4QH, UK.
Annual Meeting of the Medieval Academy of America, Hosted by The Medieval Institute of Notre Dame
Due: June 15, 2014
21 January 2014
Call for Papers: 2015 Annual Meeting of The Medieval Academy of America, hosted by The Medieval Institute of the University of Notre Dame
March 12-14, 2015
The Program Committee invites proposals for papers on all topics and in all disciplines and periods of medieval studies. Any member of the Medieval Academy may submit a paper proposal, excepting those who presented papers at the annual meetings of the Medieval Academy in 2013 or 2014; others may submit proposals as well but must become members in order to present papers at the meeting. Special consideration can be given to individuals whose specialty would not normally involve membership in the Medieval Academy.
Location: The Medieval Institute has one of the preeminent library collections for medieval studies in North America, and the University of Notre Dame’s Snite Museum of Art will showcase an exhibit on the reconstruction of a 15th-century Breton Book of Hours by the Library’s Department of Special Collections. The campus Digital Visualization Theater will be used for a 360-degree visual and aural presentation on the cosmology of Hildegard of Bingen, while the University’s DeBartolo Performing Arts Center, with five venues for film, theater, and music, will offer meeting attendees the chance to enjoy a variety of performing arts activities. Notre Dame is located about two hours’ drive from Chicago, with commuter train service available. Scholars may wish to extend their visit and take advantage of the opportunity for research or sightseeing.
Theme: “Medieval Studies across the Disciplines” will provide a conceptual focus for the meeting. The Medieval Academy welcomes innovative sessions that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries or that use various disciplinary approaches to examine an individual topic. To both facilitate and emphasize interdisciplinarity, the Call for Papers is organized in “threads.” Sessions listed under these threads have been proposed to or by the Program Committee but the list provided below is not meant to be exhaustive or exclusive.
The complete Call for Papers with additional information, submission procedures, selections guidelines and organizers is available here.
Glossator 10 (2015): Pearl — CF
Due: July 15, 2014
“Perle plesaunte to princes paye / To clanly clos in golde so clere . . . ” (Pearl, lines 1-2). Illuminating the paradoxical imperative to enclose and display the beautiful, the opening image of Pearl encodes at once the poem’s formal demand for commentary and its own commentarial poetics. On the one hand, the text’s permutative polysemy, aesthetic density, and continuing allegorical refractions persistently elicit explication in a special, conspicuous way. On the other hand, the literary dream-vision produces itself as a dialectical and interpretive reflection with and upon the Pearl herself, an unfinishable gloss on the mystery of “that specyal spyce” (938) whom the poet works to indicate across an impassible margin. Seeking to elaborate, continue, and expand Pearl’s poetics of radiant enclosure, this volume will offer a collective commentary on the full poem, divided according to its constitutive fitts or sections, which are marked by stanza-linking keywords:
III-More and More*
The editors of Glossator seek commentarial laborers for each section of this twenty-fold poetic vineyard, to be apportioned on a first-come, first-served basis. Contributions must conform to the journal’s general guidelines for commentary, which are detailed in the About section. Suggested length: 7000 words. If you are interested in contributing to this volume, please send a brief abstract to the editors at firstname.lastname@example.org. The abstract should indicate which fitt you intend to comment on and the overall approach your commentary will take. NOTA BENE: an asterisk above indicates that that fitt has been reserved.
15 July 2014: Submissions due to editors
October 2014: Submissions returned to authors with comments
15 January 2015: Final Submission
March 2015: Publication
[Open Humanities Press]
The Place of Spenser / Spenser´s Places
Due: September 15, 2014
Dublin, 18-20 June 2015
The Fifth International Spenser Society Conference
The International Spenser Society invites proposals for their next International Conference, to be held in Dublin, Ireland. The conference will address Spenser´s places – domestic, urban, global, historical, colonial, rhetorical, geopolitical, etc. – but also the place of Spenser in Renaissance studies, in the literary tradition, in Britain, in Ireland, in the literary and political cultures of his own moment.
Additionally, a series of programmed focus panels will offer opportunities for discussion of recent important initiatives and directions in Spenser studies: editing; biography; style; Ireland; philosophy and religion; teaching; and digital approaches.
We welcome abstracts from Spenser scholars and Renaissance scholars, graduate students and faculty, for papers that address Spenser´s historical, cultural and literary environments. These include the places and spaces in which he worked and the places and positions through which we approach that work.
The conference will take place in historic Dublin Castle (http://www.dublincastle.ie/) in the heart of the city, with accommodation available in local hotels. It follows the success of four previous ISS conferences, at Princeton (1990), Yale (1996), Cambridge (2001), and Toronto (2006).
An optional bus tour to Kilcolman castle, County Cork and other Spenser-related sites will take place June 21st.
Plenaries: Helen Cooper (University of Oxford), Jeffrey Dolven (Princeton University), Anne Fogarty (University College Dublin)
Confirmed speakers/presiders: Andrew Hadfield, Beth Quitslund, David Lee Miller, Julian Lethbridge, Ayesha Ramachandran, Joseph Loewenstein, Andrew Zurcher, David Wilson-Okamura, Patricia Palmer, Willy Maley, Susannah Brietz Monta, Kevin De Ornellas
Abstracts should be submitted directly to the conference website: www.spenser2015.com
The closing date for submissions is 15 September 2014
Suggested topics might include (but are not restricted to) the following:
- The reception of Spenser´s poetry
- Spenser among the poets
- Spenser and political writing
- Digital Spenser
- Spenser and the Sidneys
- Spenser´s place in Renaissance studies
- Spenser´s Europe
- Spenser´s place in Irish studies
- Spenser´s social networks
- Spenser and the politics of space
- Spenser´s imaginative spaces
- Spenser and early modern Dublin
- Editing Spenser
- Spenser and early modern London
- Spenser in Munster
- Spenser and Shakespeare
- Spenser and Raleigh
- Spenser´s Atlantic world
- Spenser, history and historiography
- Spenser and archaeology
- Material Spenser/Spenser´s materials
- Structural/topomorphic approaches
- Spenser´s style
- Religion and philosophy
- Spenser´s Books
- Teaching Spenser
We also invite proposals for poster-board demonstrations of relevant digital and other projects.
Jane Grogan (University College Dublin), Andrew King (University College Cork), Thomas Herron (East Carolina University)
Sponsored by the International Spenser Society
Seminar on English manuscript studies
The focus is on editing manuscripts from all periods, whether they be strictly literary or not. The seminar is particularly interested in unpublished material in manuscript. Research topics include, and are not restricted to, finding manuscripts and archival work, manuscript collections, scribal work, paleography, manuscripts as books, the coexistence of manuscripts and printed books, what manuscripts tell us on reading habits, editing manuscripts, electronic versus printed editions, manuscript studies and digital humanities. Manuscript studies have been on the cutting edge of literary theory and papers on authorship, the constitution of the text or hermeneutics are welcome.
Please send your proposals to: